ข่าวแจ้งตลาดหลักทรัพย์
16 พฤศจิกายน 2550
) Reformat Opinion of IFA regarding investment in TBC
decreased in value slightly.However, ROA and ROFA during first half of 2007
decreased close to the performance in 2005 since its profitability during this
period return to its normal level.
Asset turnover ratio increased continuously from 2005 to the first
half of 2007,reflecting an improvement in the efficiency of asset utilization
as TBC generated more revenue from expansion of its customer base
domestically and internationally i.e. Heineken,and customer in Vietnam market.
Financial Policy Analysis
Although the debt to equity ratio as of the first half of 2007
increased from that of 2006, the amount of equity was higher than liabilities.
Furthermore, interest coverage ratio increased from 25.47 times in 2006 to
42.21 times in the first half of 2007. The ratio represented that TBC enabled
to repay the interest. Nevertheless, debt service coverage ratio declined due
to TBC policy of dividend payment at 50% of net profit per year. In 2006,
dividend payout ratio, which based on operation in 2005, equaled to 33% of net
profit
before a deduction of retained loss of 67.05 million baht. Therefore, the
dividend payment of 60 million baht in 2006 represented 51.55% of net profit
after a deduction of retained loss. In addition, during first half of 2007,
TBC paid the dividend at 51.65% of the net profit.
32
2. Independent Financial Advisor Opinion
2.1 Reasonableness and Benefits of the Connected Transaction
Packaging Business Expansion
TBC share acquisition of 50 million share or 50% of paid-up capital is
considered as an expansion in the packaging business of BJC from glass and
plastic packaging material to aluminum packaging material. The expansion
provides BJC a continuing growth along a growing trend of portable packaging,
which correspond to changes in life-style of worldwide consumers; for example,
customer needs for more convenience and single-
serving-size package.
In addition, BJC will get benefits from the acquisition, which are
economy of scale, economy of scope, and safeguard against competitors with
substitute products, especially beverage packaging such as glass bottles and
plastic bottles. Furthermore, BJC also obtains benefits from gaining the
market share in aluminum can market because TBC is the second largest can
maker in Thailand with a market share of around 34%. BJC can also expand its
customer base through TBC existing customers, most of which are famous and
have strong
financial status in both domestic and export market.
Reduction in Opportunity Cost
For business expansion, BJC can either build up a new business from
scratch or acquire existing company. Furthermore, TBC share acquisition also
helps BJC generate sales revenue from aluminum can business immediately
compared to building an aluminum can business from scratch by itself, which
requires more time to build up new factory, pitch for customers, and gain
recognition from customers.
Therefore, the TBC share acquisition is reasonable in term of business
expansion.This business strategy will increase the competitiveness and prevent
competition from substitute products at the same time, and also reduce
opportunity cost from building up a new business from scratch.
2.2 Advantages and Disadvantages of the Acquisition
2.2.1 Advantages
Investment in Financially Sound Company
TBC is the second largest aluminum can maker in Thailand, and has
a large customer base in both domestic and export market. Furthermore, TBC
has a strong financial status and generate revenues of more than a billion
baht per year with a net profit more than 200 million baht per year. In 2006,
TBC gained a net profit of 242 million baht and a return on equity of 20.04%.
Moreover, current ratio indicated that TBC has adequacy of current assets to
cover current liabilities.
Technology Transfer from TBC Shareholder
One of TBC shareholders, Ball South East Asia Holding, is a
subsidiary of Ball Corporation, which owns license of aluminum can production
technology in USA. TBC acquisition provides BJC an opportunity to learn the
production technology and know how of raw material procurement from Ball
Corporation, the owner of aluminum can production technology from USA. This
enables BJC to adopt such technology in the cost management for more efficiency.
33
2.2.2 Disadvantages
BJC has to take risk from the fluctuation of aluminum price and
foreign exchange. The main raw material in can production is aluminum, the
price of which depends on the market price in London Metal Exchange (LME). The
characteristic of aluminum is a commodity product, where its price depends
not only on the supply and demand of aluminum, but also other exogenous
factors such as oil price and speculation. All these factors cause a
volatility in the aluminum price in the world market Based on TBC cost
structure as of the first of 2007, aluminum cost represents 80.39% of total
cost of
good sold of TBC, while 29% of sales revenue is in US dollar. This provides
TBC a partial natural hedge. In the strengthening Thai Baht situation, TBC is
better off as it usually has a net outflow in US dollar. On the contrary, if
Thai Baht is weakening, BJC may be adversely affected by the volatility in
aluminum price and foreign exchange rate to some extent.
However, TBC's Board of Directors, those who are not connected
persons with BJC are veterans in aluminum packaging business. They use the
strategies to manage the risk by hedging the aluminum price through pricing
contract with aluminum suppliers, and through forward contracts on foreign
exchange rate with financial institutions.
2.2.3 Advantages and Disadvantages of entering or not entering the
Transaction
If BJC decides not to acquire TBC share, BJC will lose the
opportunity to expand into aluminum packaging business. Moreover, there are
only a few players of aluminum can manufacturers in Thailand, and all of them
already have business alliances or shareholders, which are competitors of
major shareholders of BJC. Therefore, BJC is necessary to do the transaction
in order to maintain its competitiveness.
In addition, BJC decides to use internally generated fund or
debenture.Independent financial advisor is of the opinion that BJC has
adequate cash flow to conduct the transaction. Furthermore, debenture will not
affect the financial condition of BJC because BJC had a debt to equity ratio
equal to 0.80 times as of the second quarter of 2007.
It indicated that BJC's equity is larger than debt, and the capability of BJC
to repay interest expense was 7.52 times.
2.3 The Necessity of Entering into the Connected Transaction
The major shareholders of TBC can be classified into 3 groups, which are:
1. The Chayavivatkuls, the owner and key man of TBC management
team, owns 42% of TBC shares.
2. Ball South East Asia Holding Company Limited, aluminum can
production technology owner, owns 6.67% of TBC shares.
3. Connected persons of BJC own 50% of TBC shares.
BJC is necessary to undertake the transaction with the connected
persons as the Chayavivatkuls, Ball South East Asia Holding Company Limited,
and other shareholders do not wish to sell their TBC shares. Furthermore, by
maintaining the Chayavivatkuls and Ball South East Asia Holding Company
Limited as TBC shareholders will benefit BJC in that TBC will still be managed
by experienced management team, and also supported by world-renowned
technological expert in aluminum can production.
34
3 Fairness of the Price and the Conditions of the Connected Transaction
3.1 Fairness of the Acquisition Price
The Board of Directors' Meeting of BJC No. 72 on October 18th, 2007
approved TBC shares acquisition for 50 million shares at 21.48 baht per share,
totally 1,074 million baht. Independent financial advisor uses various
valuation methodologies based on the audited financial statement of TBC as of
31st December 2006 because it is more reliable than the unreviewed financial
statement as of 30th June 2007. Each share valuation approach is as follow:
3.1.1 Book Value Approach
Based on the consolidated financial statement as of December 31st,
2006, the book value of the Company's share is as follows:
Issued and Paid-up Capital 1,000.00 Million Baht
Surplus revaluation of assets-the - Million Baht
company
Accumulated Profit
Legal Reserve 6.00 Million Baht
Unappropriated 292.37 Million Baht
Total Equity 1,298.37 Million Baht
No. of Share : Par Value at 10 Baht 100.00 Million Shares
Book Value per Share 12.98 Baht
According to the TBC financial statement as of December 31st, 2006, the
book value approach yielded the share value of 12.98 baht per share.
3.1.2 Adjusted Book Value Approach
By adjusting the value of some asset items to the appraised value,
this approach reflects the share value of a firm more than the book value
approach.
Under the adjusted book value approach, TBC share value is derived
from the total assets as of December 31st, 2006, adjusted by the
surplus/discount value of fixed asset evaluated by an Independent Asset
Appraiser, minus total liabilities, and divided by the number of outstanding
shares. This calculated value represents the Net Asset Value (NAV) that
reflects the market value better than the value derived from the Book Value
Approach.
The Financial Advisor adjusted the asset value based on the Asset
Appraisal Report as of September 17th, 2007 prepared by Thai Property
Appraisal Lynn Phillips Company Limited, a SEC certified Independent Asset
Appraiser. The adjusted value of fixed assets are as follows:
35
Million Baht
Book Value
Apprised Assets Appraisal Surplus
(December31st, 2007) Value (Discount)
Land 91.95 158.73 66.78
Building and Improvement 255.35 260.00 4.65
Machines and Equipments 752.69 1,079.10 326.41
Total 1,099.99 1,497.83 397.84
The Adjusted Book Value is as follows:
Million Baht
Value Value
Item (before Adjustment (after adjustment)
adjustment)
Total Assets 2,311.94 397.84 2,709.78
Total Liabilities 1,013.57 - 1,013.57
Book Value 1,298.37 - 1,696.21
No. of Outstanding Shares (Million shares) 100.00 - 100.00
Book Value Per Share (Baht per Share) 12.98 16.96
The Adjusted Book Value Approach yields the value of 16.96 baht per
share
3.1.3 Market Comparable Approach
The market comparable approach derives the Company's share value by
comparing the statistical ratio of TBC with the listed companies in the
similar business. The market comparable approach will use price per book value
ratio and price per earning ratio to calculate share value.
There are 13 listed companies in the packaging sector of the Stock
Exchange of Thailand. Each company operates many kinds of packaging business
such as plastic packages, plastic bags, metal boxes, plastic film packages,
and paper boxes. There are only Alucon Public Company Limited or ALUCON, which
operates in aluminum packaging such as aluminum tubes, and Crown Seal Public
Company Limited or CSC, which manufactures aluminum crown caps. Like TBC,
both companies use aluminum as raw materials. Therefore, the Independent
Financial Advisor decided to use the price per book value ratio and price per
earning ratio of these two companies as a reference for TBC share valuation.
36
P/E Multiple Approach
This approach uses the earning per share of Baht 2.42 per share as of
December 31st,2006 and multiply with the weighted average of Price per Earning
ratio (P/E) 8.88 times of the 2 SET listed companies in the Packaging sector,
as of October 8th, 2007 as follow:
This approach uses the earning per share of 2.42 baht per share as of
December 31st, 2006 and multiply with the market-capitalization weighted
average price per earning ratio (P/E) of 8.88 times of the two comparable
firms in the packaging sector, as of October 8th, 2007 to arrive at TBC share
value as follow:
P/E (Times) Market Capitalization (Million Baht)
ALUCON 9.96 2,736
CSC 5.02 770
Weighted Average P/E 8.88
Share Value Result
EPS (Baht/Share) 2.42
Share Value (Baht/share) 21.48
The P/E multiple approach at the weighted average P/E of 8.88 times
results in TBC share value of 21.48 baht per share. Although P/E of Packaging
sector as of October 2007 equals to 8.06 times, the Independent Financial
Advisor used P/E from two listed company, which are Alucon Public Company
Limited and Crown Seal Public Company Limited, because the business and size
of these companies are similar to TBC. ALUCON manufactures the aerosol
aluminum can, and therefore, subject to the aluminum price risk like TBC.
ALUCON is also similar to TBC in size as it generated the sales revenue of
2,808.98 million baht in 2006, and 1,536.41 million baht during the first half
of 2007 and
had the total assets of 2,945.60 million baht as of the second quarter of
2007. As for CSC, it is a manufacturer of aluminum crown cap and proof cap.
CSC, therefore, subject to the aluminum price risk and sensitive to the
beverage industry likes TBC as well. In addition,CSC is similar to TBC is size
as well. CSC generated the sales revenue of 2,144.86 million baht in 2006 and
1,144.50 during the first half of 2007. As of the second quarter of 2007, the
total assets of CSC equaled to 2,050.07 million baht.
P/BV Multiple Approach
This approach uses the book value per share of Baht 12.98 per share as
of December 31st , 2006 and multiply with the market-capitalization weighted
average price per book value ratio (P/BV) of 1.42 times from two SET-listed
comparable firms as of October 8th,2007 with the details as follow:
P/BV (Times) Market Capitalization (Million Baht)
ALUCON 1.64 2,736
CSC 0.66 770
Weighted Average P/E 1.42
37
Share Value Result
Book Value per Share (Baht/Share) 12.98
Share Value based on P/BV (Baht/share) 18.43
The P/BV multiple approach at weighted average P/BV equals to 1.42
times results in share value of TBC equal to 18.43 baht per share. Although
P/BV of Packaging sector as of October 2007 equals to 0.96 times, independent
financial advisor recommended to use P/BV from 2 listed company, which are
Alucon Public Company Limited and Crown Seal Public Company Limited, because
they operate the business similar to TBC.
Under the P/BV multiple approach, the weighted average P/BV of 1.42
times results in TBC share value of 18.43 baht per share. Although the P/BV of
the packaging sector as of October 2007 equals to 0.96 times, the Independent
Financial Advisor used the weighted average P/BV from the two comparable
firms, which are Alucon Public Company Limited and Crown Seal Public Company
Limited, because these firms they operate the business similar to TBC.
3.1.4 Discounted Cash Flow Approach
Under this approach, the operating capability and future prospect of a
firm was taken into consideration based on the management's prospects, the
assessment of economy, and other related business factors. The free cash flows
to equity (after debt repayment) are discounted to the net present value at
the cost of equity with the reasonable debt-to-equity ratio to arrive at the
equity value. Under this approach, the share value o directly relates to the
profitability while non-cash expenses such as depreciation and amortization do
not affect the calculation.
The Financial Advisor developed the financial projection for a 10-year
period to forecast the future cash flows. The assumptions are based on a going
concern basis and there are no significant changes in fundamental policy and
operating environment. The Financial Advisor also adapted the management's
assumption to correspond with the economic condition at the time of the case
for the purpose of evaluating the fair TBC share price to the Board of
Directors of Berli Jucker Public Company Limited. If there are significant
changes in the economic conditions and factors affecting TBC business from the
stated assumptions, the share value derived from this approach will change
accordingly,and therefore, the stated share value shall not be use as
reference price for other purposes beyond this study.
The cost of equity (Ke) is calculated from Capital Asset Pricing Model
(CAPM).
The discount rate has various factors as follows:
Ke = Rf + ?(Rm-Rf)
Risk free rate (Rf) = The rate of return from
investment in any
riskless securities
Market return (Rm) = The rate of return from
investment in the
Stock Exchange of Thailand
Beta (?) = Slope represents the relationship
between stock price and the stock
price index
However, there is no aluminum can manufacturing company listed on the
Stock Exchange of Thailand. Therefore, the Independent Financial Advisor
calculated ? by using the information from the listed companies on the SET and
foreign stock exchange, which operate in a business similar to that of TBC.
The ? was then used to calculate the cost of equity.
38
Major Assumptions for the Discounted Cash Flow approach are as
follows:
(1). 10-year projection period starting from year 2007 to 2017
(2). Sales Revenue
Sales Volume
Currently, a can line has a maximum capacity of 900
million cans per year.TBC plans to expand a second can line in 2008, which
would bring a capacity level to 1,200 cans per year. It also plans to increase
the machine in the second can line to increase the capacity level to 1,400 in
2012. As for end line, the maximum capacity is fixed at 1,585 ends per year
for all the projection period.
Historical Projection
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
to
2017
Can
Maximum 900 900 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,400 1,400 1,400 1,400
Capacity
(Million Cans)
Capacity 97.6 99.3 88.3 92.7 97.3 100.0 90.0 94.5 99.2 100.0
Utilization %
Ends
Maximum 1,585 1,585 1,585 1,585 1,585 1,585 1,585 1,585 1,585 1,585
Capacity
(Million Ends)
Capacity 69.9 76.3 79.9 83.7 87.6 91.8 96.2 100.0 100.0 100.0
Utilization %
Domestic sales volume growth is based on the weighted
average growth rate of several industries (information from Bank of Thailand )
in which TBC's customers operate i.e. beer and soft drink industries. For
export market, export sales volume growth rate is based on the weighted
average GDP growth rate of each country in which TBC's customers operate.
Except for the sales volume growth of 19% in 2008 based on TBC budget and plan
with its customers, sales volume growth of other years are projected at the
rate setout below until sales volume reach the capacity limit.
Can Growth Rate End Growth Rate
(%) (%)
Domestic Market 3.81 3.74
Export Market 7.08 7.06
2
Reference: Research Center, Krung Thai Bank
39
Sales Price per Unit
Sales price per unit of can and end are varied by the price of aluminum on
London Metal Exchange and other cost of production.
Sales price varies in different markets. Sales price is set from the total
cost of production at that time and added with the mark-up margin according
to the historical average of mark-up margin in 2004, 2005, and the first h
half of 2007.The mark-up margin in 2006 is excluded from the calculation as
TBC had a particularly high mark-up margin from a stocking of raw material
before an increase in aluminum price in mid 2006. The projected mark-up
margin is as follows:
Mark-up Margin (%)
Domestic Market
(more)



